After recent incidents of dog attacks, the Centre has written to chief secretaries of states and Union territories to ensure prohibition on sale, breeding or the import and breeding of 23 dog breeds in India. The news about the ban on the import and breeding of 23 dog breeds in India has created quite a stir. There are also a lot of misconceptions around it. For one, the letter by the Department of Animal Husbandry and Dairying, Government of India, is a recommendation and not a rule yet. So, the 23 listed breeds, including a Rottweiler and Dogo Argentino are not banned. A ban can only happen if a gazette was passed and the Union Government decreed the ban as a rule. The restrictions will also extend to mixed and cross-bred canines. Existing house pets of these breeds are to be sterilised. The move comes days after appeals from People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) India to protect dogs commonly exploited by criminal elements of society for illegal dogfighting, as well as children and elderly citizens who are often injured or even killed by some breeds of dogs. While animal activists, rescuers welcomed the move, they however detested the reason behind the prohibition\/ban. PETA applauded the move that seeks to safeguard vulnerable dog breeds commonly exploited by criminal elements for illegal dog fighting and the reports of numerous cases of children and elderly citizens wounded and even killed by specific types of dogs who were manipulated and trained to attack. However, another activist of the People For Animals(PFA) maintained there was no such thing as \u201caggressive breed\u201d while welcoming the regulation but not the reason. According to the activist, those considered aggressive breeds were due to the cruelty subjected on dogs by unscrupulous breeders. The point being highlighted is that it was crucial to recognize that the behaviour of a dog was primarily influenced by its upbringing, environment, and training rather than its breed alone. Thus, punishing entire breeds based on the actions of a few individuals is unfair and discriminatory, said the activist. Such bans also pose challenges for responsible owners who may already own dogs of the banned breeds, forcing them into difficult situations or even leading to the euthanasia of innocent animals. According to the activist, breed-specific legislation was not the most effective approach to address these concerns. What was proposed instead, was implementation of breed-neutral laws focused on holding owners accountable for the actions of their pets and promoting education and awareness about dog behaviour and responsible ownership were the most logical steps. The recommendation, though, has found both supporters and critics, and has once again opened the debate on buying dogs, especially exotic breeds, versus adopting Indie breeds. It has also highlighted the need for stricter breeding regulations, compulsory training for all dogs and their pet parents, and pan-India sterilisation drives. The topic of banning specific dog breeds is a complex and controversial issue. While some advocates argue that banning certain breeds improves public safety by reducing the risk of dog attacks, others believe that breed-specific legislation is ineffective and unfairly targets specific breeds rather than addressing the root causes of aggressive behaviour in dogs. Research has shown that factors such as responsible ownership, socialization, and training have a greater impact on preventing dog bites than breed-specific laws. It\u2019s important to consider various perspectives and consult reliable sources when discussing this topic.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
After recent incidents of dog attacks, the Centre has written to chief secretaries of states and Union territories to ensure prohibition on sale, breeding or the import and breeding of 23 dog breeds in India. The news about the ban on the import and breeding of 23 dog breeds in India has created quite a […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[685],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-411398","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","category-editorial"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/nagalandpost.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/411398","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/nagalandpost.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/nagalandpost.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nagalandpost.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nagalandpost.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=411398"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/nagalandpost.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/411398\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/nagalandpost.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=411398"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nagalandpost.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=411398"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nagalandpost.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=411398"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}