Saying the unsaid

During the concluding session of the 14th Nagaland Legislative Assembly, Kuzholuzo (Azo) Neinu, a leader of the NPF and a member of the unique opposition-less government, voiced concerns that demand serious attention. His remarks, though not new, shed light on the persistent issues plaguing Nagaland’s law and order situation-a reality that the state government is often too eager to downplay. The state government routinely reassures the public that the situation is under control, frequently citing the relative calm compared to the turbulent pre-July 1997 era before the ceasefire was established. However, Azo’s observations underscore the concerns of many Nagas who had hoped that the ceasefire agreements would pave the way for lasting peace and the reconstruction of lives disrupted by decades of conflict. His remarks highlight a troubling trend: the ceasefire, intended to be a step towards peace, has instead become a cover for rampant extortion, threats, and other criminal activities-actions that are in direct opposition to the very principles of Naga nationalism. The problem, as Azo pointed out, is that the state government and its police force are often powerless to enforce the law when the offenders are members of the various factions involved in the ceasefire. These cases are typically referred to the Cease Fire Monitoring Group (CFMG) or the Cease Fire Supervisory Board (CFSB), where they often languish without resolution, with only vague assurances that the issues will be addressed. Compounding this issue is the alarming proliferation of factions. From the initial four in 1997, the number has ballooned to 26, with no guarantee that it won’t continue to rise. This factionalism, driven by tribalism or opportunism, is increasingly seen as a platform for pursuing power and wealth rather than resolving the Naga political issue. Neinu’s primary suggestion is the relocation of all Designated Camps to Kohima, with the offices of the Cease Fire Monitoring Group (CFMG) and Cease Fire Supervisory Board (CFSB) also situated in the state capital. He emphasizes the need for these locations to be adequately protected by the Assam Rifles and the State Armed Police. Such a move, he argues, would not only centralize oversight but also enhance coordination, ensuring that all activities related to the ceasefire are closely monitored and controlled. This centralization could act as a deterrent against the misuse of ceasefire agreements as a cover for criminal activities, a problem that has persisted for years. A critical aspect of Neinu’s proposals is his call to end the persistent buck-passing between the Central and State governments. He suggested that the CFMG and CFSB should include top officials from both the Centre and the State, ensuring that issues are addressed promptly and at the highest levels. This approach could prevent the shirking of responsibility that has characterized the handling of the Naga political issue for decades. Neinu also urged upon the Nagaland state government to clarify its stance on the Naga political issue. After years of rhetoric and empty promises, he urged the government to recognize its constitutional obligations and remember the mandate given by the people. The time for debate and discussion has long passed; what is needed now is decisive action that aligns with the aspirations of the Naga people.