Dead sea of rhetoric

0
78

Nagaland, a land of immense potential and abundant resources, has unfortunately found itself shackled by a false narrative.

This narrative, laced with rhetoric and self glorification to hard sell people’s aspirations, has proved a costly exercise that contradicts reality. Since 2004 and despite several investors’ summits, no significant investor has committed to the state. This glaring void reflects deeper issues that have driven both opportunity and optimism away from Nagaland and a revelation about misplaced priorities.

The vision documents which promised utopian progress were only as good as being in wonderland; but now stand as mute testimony to the state being grounded by challenges. Instead, pioneering businessmen and entrepreneurs, who once brought goods and provided services to the state are increasingly cornered and most are forced to leave as armed factions and associations make life hell.

These groups impose illegal levies under the guise of taxes and fees, operating with unchecked impunity. Those brave enough to challenge this lawlessness are often ostracized, vilified, and silenced by an organized minority. This intimidation thrives amid a broader culture of silence. A majority of citizens, fearing retribution or seeking to maintain superficial neutrality, choose not to speak out.

This muteness is often mistaken for prudence but reveals a concerning lack of moral conviction. Like chameleons, many shift their stances to blend with prevailing winds, unwilling to risk standing for truth and justice. Such silence enables lawlessness to persist and fractures the very fabric of a society that prides itself on unity and uniqueness. Internal divisions, rooted in biases of tribe and gender, further deepen the chasm. Instead of fostering partnerships, these divisions create adversaries. Leaders seem more intent on falling back on insane rhetoric further pushing reasoned thinking to the precipice than on collaborating to address the urgent challenges of lawlessness, economic stagnation, and social degeneration.

What should be a collective march toward peace and prosperity has devolved into a fragmented struggle, devoid of shared purpose? History is unequivocal: societies lacking leaders of integrity and moral vision inevitably spiral into decline. Nagaland today bears the hallmarks of such a trajectory. The consequences of this moral and administrative decay are everywhere-manifesting as lawlessness, a loss of authority, and the erosion of societal values. It is time to reject the false narratives, confront the harsh realities, and work toward a vision of just peace based towards unity, progress, and shared prosperity. Only then can Nagaland realize its true potential as a vibrant and thriving society that it was till populist rhetoric derailed the progress.

What is needed now is courageous and principled leadership, combined with a citizenry unafraid to speak out for truth and justice. Outspokenness must be driven by a genuine desire to uphold what is right, not by coercion or tribal allegiance. Democracy flourishes when individuals voice their opinions freely and responsibly, not when discourse is confined to the narrow interests of political issue that has lost relevance with the upcoming generation. The future generation are well informed must get back on track and learn from the mistakes of the current generation of leaders. To correct the drift, they must get rid of insane populist rhetoric that have not only captured their imaginations but made them helpless captives to the evil of isms which have divided and damaged society