NSCN/GPRN(K) cautioned, that the justification by Khehoi camp on “its merger arrangement with the IM” as reciprocity to FNR’s reconciliation and unification “instead of political expediency” could embroil the FNR in “sensitive political squabble” if the process backfired.
MIP alleged that both forces (GPRN/NSCN and NSCN/GPRN-IM) formed an “unholy collusion” against NSCN/GPRN(K) through belligerent stance and open threat to attack its Suruhuto designated camp. MIP said as NSCN/GPRN(K) was a partner to FNR’s CoR and that the Khehoi camp’s strategy “simultaneous with its merger with IM, implies the role of FNR as well.”
MIP said it remained to be seen whether this policy was to present a case of “an alliance with IM” to the government of India or to “to undermine” NSCN/GPRN(K).
It warned that the consequences of such “impulsive and shortsighted recourse” which “portends grave disaster in the making” that would haunt future generations of Nagas.
MIP said the government of India’s stance vis-à-vis Naga issue was not complementary to sufferings endured and consequent intolerance of Nagas against political violence.
It opined that ongoing political dialogue not only be expedited but include those currently not within the purview of the talks. It said the signing of cease fires between the government of India with the two NSCNs and FNR’s CoR between various opposing Naga political parties brought about a much desired level of understanding, tolerance and mutual acceptance. It asserted that ongoing process be honoured so as to lead it to the direction of ultimate goal of political solution through negotiation with the government of India.
For More Updates, follow us on
and
